Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T21:20:58.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spears, Darts, and Arrows: Late Woodland Hunting Techniques in the Upper Ohio Valley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael J. Shott
Michael J. Shott*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, IA 50614
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The belief that the bow and arrow replaced the spear and/or dart as hunting weapons in eastern North America between 1500 and 1200 B.P. is tested using a classification function that identifies bifaces as either spear/dart or arrow points. Results and their alternative interpretations bear important implications for the timing and nature of the technological transition. Moreover, the economic consequences of the transition are at once subtler and less profound than often supposed. Ethnographic data do not support simple notions of a uniform increase in acquisition efficiency across target species with the adoption of the bow and arrow.

Resumen

Resumen

Arqueólogos creen que la lanza y el dardo fueron reemplazados por el arco y la flecha como instrumentos de la caza entre 1500 y 1200 A.P. en el este de Norteamérica. Se examina esta creencia a través de una función de clasificación que identifica los bífaces como punta de dardo o de flecha. Los resultados y sus interpretaciónes alternativas tienen implicaciónes importantes para la sincronización y la naturaleza de esta transición tecnológica. Además, las consecuencias económicas de la transición son a la vez más refinadas y menos profundas de lo que frecuentamente se supone. Datos etnográficos no respaldan nociones simples de un aumento uniforme en eficiéncia de adquisición de determinadas especies con la adopción del arco y la flecha.

Type
Articles
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 58 , Issue 3 , July 1993 , pp. 425 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Ahler, S. A. 1971 Projectile Point Form and Function at Rodgers Shelter, Missouri. Research Series No. 8. Missouri Archaeological Society, Columbia.Google Scholar
Allman, J. C. 1960 The Erp Bluff-Top Site: Notes on the First Season's Work. Ohio Archaeologist 10: 60–66.Google Scholar
Beckerman, S. 1983 Carpe Diem: An Optimal Foraging Approach to Bari Fishing and Hunting. In Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians, edited by Hames, R. and Vickers, W., pp. 269–299. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bergman, C. A., McEwen, E., and Miller, R. 1989 Experimental Archery: Projectile Velocities and Comparison of Bow Performances. Antiquity 62: 658–670.Google Scholar
Blitz, J. H. 1988 Adoption of the Bow in Prehistoric North America. North American Archaeologist 9: 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, D. P. 1987 Coevolution of Sedentism, Pottery Technology, and Horticulture in the Central Midwest, 200 B. C. -A. D. 600. In Emergent Horticultural Economies of the Eastern Woodlands, edited by Keegan, W., pp. 153–181. Occasional Paper No. 7. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Christenson, A. L. 1981 The Evolution of Subsistence in the Prehistoric Midwestern United States. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Christenson, A. L. 1986a Projectile Point Size and Projectile Aerodynamics: An Exploratory Study. Plains Anthropologist 31: 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christenson, A. L. 1986b Reconstructing Prehistoric Projectiles from Their Stone Points. Journal of the Society of Archer-Antiquaries 29: 21–27.Google Scholar
Churchill, S. E., and Curran, B. K. 1991 Weapon Technology, Prey Size Selection and Hunting Methods in Modern Hunter-Gatherers and Implications for Paleolithic Archaeology. Paper presented at the 56th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Clark, J. D. 1975 Interpretations of Prehistoric Technology from Ancient Egyptian and Other Sources, Part II: Prehistoric Arrow Forms in Africa as Shown by Surviving Examples of the Traditional Arrows of the San Bushmen. Paleorient 3: 127–150.Google Scholar
Clark, J. D., Phillips, J. L., and Staley, P. S. 1974 Interpretations of Prehistoric Technology from Ancient Egyptian and Other Sources, Part I: Ancient Egyptian Bows and Arrows and Their Relevance for African Prehistory. Paleorient 2: 323–388.Google Scholar
Cole, F. -C, and Deuel, T. 1937 Rediscovering Illinois: Archaeological Explorations in and Around Fulton County. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Cotterell, B., and Kamminga, J. 1990 Mechanics of Pre-Industrial Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dwyer, P. D. 1974 The Price of Protein: Five Hundred Hours of Hunting in the New Guinea Highlands. Oceania 44: 278–293.Google Scholar
Fawcett, W. B., and Kornfeld, M. 1980 Projectile Point Neck-Width Variability and Chronology on the Plains. Wyoming Contributions to Anthropology 2: 66–79.Google Scholar
Flenniken, J. J., and Raymond, A. W. 1986 Morphological Projectile Point Typology: Replication Experimentation and Technological Analysis. American Antiquity 51: 603–614.Google Scholar
Ford, R. I. 1974 Northeastern Archaeology: Past and Future Directions. Annual Review of Anthropology 3: 385–413.Google Scholar
Fowler, D., and Matley, J. 1979 Material Culture of the Numa: The John Wesley Powell Collection, 1867-1880. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology No. 26. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Friis-Hansen, J. 1990 Mesolithic Cutting Arrows: Functional Analysis of Arrows Used in the Hunting of Large Game. Antiquity 64: 494–504.Google Scholar
Frison, G. C. 1978 Prehistoric Hunters of the High Plains. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Funkhouser, W., and Webb, W. S. 1937 The Chilton Site in Henry County, Kentucky. Reports in Anthropology and Archaeology No. 3. University of Kentucky, Lexington.Google Scholar
Glassow, M. 1972 Changes in the Adaptations of Southwestern Basket Makers: A Systematic Perspective. In Contemporary Archaeology: A Guide to Theory and Contributions, edited by Leone, M., pp. 289–302. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Google Scholar
Goodyear, A. C. 1974 The Brand Site: A Techno-Functional Study of a Dalton Site in Northeast Arkansas. Research Series No. 7. Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Goodwin, A. J. 1945 Some Historical Bushman Arrows. South African Journal of Science 41: 429–443.Google Scholar
Goslin, R. M. 1960 Notes on Swinehart Village Excavations. Manuscript on file, Ohio Archaeological and Historical Society, Columbus.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B. 1978 The Midlands and Northeastern United States. In Ancient Native Americans, edited by Jennings, J. D., pp. 221–279. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Guthrie, R. D. 1983 Osseous Projectile Points: Biological Considerations Affecting Raw Material Selection and Design Among Paleolithic and Paleoindian Peoples. In Animals and Archaeology: 1. Hunters and Their Prey, edited by Clutton-Brock, J. and Grigson, C., pp. 273–294. BAR International Series 163. British Archaeological Reports, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hall, R. L. 1977 An Anthropocentric Perspective for Eastern United States Prehistory. American Antiquity 42: 499–518.Google Scholar
Hall, R. L. 1980 An Interpretation of the Two-Climax Model of Illinois Prehistory. In Early Native Americans: Prehistory, Demography, Economy and Technology, edited by Browman, D. L., pp. 401–462. Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
Hames, R. B., and Vickers, W. T. 1982 Optimal Diet Breadth Theory as a Model to Explain Variability in Amazonian Hunting. American Ethnologist 9: 358–378.Google Scholar
Hamilton, T. M. 1982 Native American Bows. 2nd ed. Special Publication No. 5. Missouri Archaeological Society, Columbia.Google Scholar
Harako, R. 1976 The Mbuti as Hunters: A Study of the Ecological Anthropology of the Mbuti Pygmies. Kyoto University African Studies 10: 39–99.Google Scholar
Harako, R. 1981 The Cultural Ecology of Hunting Behavior Among Mbuti Pygmies in the Ituri Forest, Zaire. In Omnivorous Primates: Gathering and Hunting in Human Evolution, edited by Harding, R. and Teleki, G., pp. 499–555. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Harrington, M. R. 1960 The Ozark Bluff-Dwellers. Indian Notes and Monographs No. 12. Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
Hill, K., and Hawkes, K. 1983 Neotropical Hunting Among the Ache of Eastern Paraguay. In Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians, edited by Hames, R. and Vickers, W., pp. 139–188. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hill, K., and Kaplan, H. 1989 Population and Dry-Season Subsistence Strategies of the Recently Contacted Yora of Peru. National Geographic Research 5: 317–334.Google Scholar
Hill, M. W. 1948 The Atlatl or Throwing Stick: A Recent Study of Atlatls in Use with Darts of Various Sizes. Tennessee Archaeologist 4(4): 37–44.Google Scholar
Hoffman, C. M. 1985 Projectile Point Maintenance and Typology: Assessment with Factor Analysis and Canonical Correlation. In For Concordance in Archaeological Analysis, edited by Carr, C., pp. 566–612. Westport, Kansas City.Google Scholar
Howard, C. D. 1974 The Atl-atl: Function and Performance. American Antiquity 39: 102–104.Google Scholar
Justice, N. D. 1987 Stone Age Spear and Arrow Points of the Midcontinental and Eastern United States: A Modern Survey and Reference. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Kellar, J. H. 1955 The Atlatl in North A merica. Prehistory Research Series 3(3). Indiana Historical Society, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. E., Finney, F. A., McElrath, D. L., and Ozuk, S. J. 1984 Late Woodland Period. In American Bottom Archaeology: A Summary of the FAI-270 Project, Contribution to the Culture History of the Mississippi River Valley, edited by Bareis, C. and Porter, J., pp. 104–127. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
Knight, G. C, and Keyser, J. D. 1983 A Mathematical Technique for Dating Projectile Points Common to the Northwestern Plains. Plains Anthropologist 28: 199–207.Google Scholar
Krause, F. 1905 Sling Contrivances for Projectile Weapons. Smithsonian Institution Annual Report for 1904, pp. 619–638. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Lambert, P. M., and Walker, P. L. 1991 Physical Anthropological Evidence for the Evolution of Social Complexity in Coastal Southern California. Antiquity 65: 963–973.Google Scholar
Larralde, S. L. 1990 The Design of Hunting Weapons: Archaeological Evidence from Southwestern Wyoming. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Lewis, T. M., and Kneberg, M. 1946 Hiwassee Island: An Archaeological Account of Four Tennessee Indian Peoples. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Luchterhand, K. 1970 Early Archaic Projectile Points and Hunting Patterns in the Lower Illinois Valley. Report of Investigations No. 19. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Martin, G. C. 1933 Archaeological Explorations of the Shumla Caves. Bulletin No. 3. Witte Memorial Museum, San Antonio.Google Scholar
Mera, H. P. 1938 Reconnaissance and Excavation in Southeastern New Mexico. Memoir No. 51. American Anthropological Association, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Miller, P. A. 1980 Archaic lithics from the Coffey site. In Archaic Prehistory on the Prairie-Plains Border, edited by Johnson, A. E., pp. 107–111. Publications in Anthropology No. 12. University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. H. 1974 Ancient Society, Or Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery Through Barbarism to Civilization. Edited and annotated by E. Leacock. Peter Smith, Gloucester, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Morse, D. F. 1971 The Hawkins Cache: A Significant Dalton Find in Northeast Arkansas. Arkansas Archeologist 12: 9–20.Google Scholar
Morse, P., and Morse, D. F. 1990 The Zebree Site: An Emerged Early Mississippian Expression in Northeast Arkansas. In The Mississippian Emergence, edited by Smith, B., pp. 51–66. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Muller, J. 1986 Archaeology of the Lower Ohio Valley. Academic Press, Orlando.Google Scholar
Nelson, E. W. 1899 The Eskimo About Bering Strait. Bureau of American Ethnology Annual Report 18: 19–518. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Norusis, M. J. 1986 SPSS/PC+ Advanced Statistics. SPSS, Chicago.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H. 1988 Addressing Prehistoric Hunting Practices Through Stone Tool Analysis. American Anthropologist 90: 335–356.Google Scholar
Odell, G. H., and Cowan, F. 1986 Experiments with Spears and Arrows on Animal Targets. Journal of Field Archaeology 13: 195–212.Google Scholar
Osaki, M. 1984 The Social Influence of Change in Hunting Technique Among the Central Kalahari San. African Study Monographs 5: 49–62. Kyoto.Google Scholar
Patterson, L. W. 1985 Distinguishing Between Arrow and Spear Points on the Upper Texas Coast. Lithic Technology 14: 81–89.Google Scholar
Pepper, G. H. 1905 The Throwing-Stick of a Prehistoric People of the Southwest. Proceedings of the International Congress of Americanists 13: 107–130.Google Scholar
Perino, G. 1973 The Late Woodland Component at the Pete Klunk Site, Calhoun County, Illinois. In Late Woodland Site Archaeology in Illinois I: Investigations in South-Central Illinois, edited by Brown, J., pp. 58–89. Bulletin No. 9. Illinois Archaeological Survey, Urbana.Google Scholar
Pope, S. T. 1923 A Study of Bows and Arrows. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 13: 329–414. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Prufer, O. H. 1967 Chesser Cave: A Late Woodland Phase in Southeastern Ohio. In Studies in Ohio Archaeology, edited by Prufer, O. and McKenzie, D., pp. 1–62. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Prufer, O. H., and Shane, O. C. 1970 Blain Village and the Fort Ancient Tradition in Ohio. Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Raymond, A. 1986 Experiments in the Function and Performance of the Weighted Atlatl. World Archaeology 18: 153— 177.Google Scholar
Reeves, B. 1990 Communal Bison Hunters of the Northern Plains. In Hunters of the Recent Past, edited by Davis, L. and Reeves, B., pp. 168–194. Unwin Hyman, London.Google Scholar
Reidhead, V. 1981 Optimization and Food Procurement at the Prehistoric Leonard Haag Site, Southeastern Indiana: A Linear Programming Approach. Prehistory Research Series No. 6(1). Indiana Historical Society, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Ritchie, W. A. 1961 A Typology and Nomenclature for New York Projectile Points. Bulletin No. 384. New York State Museum and Science Service, Albany.Google Scholar
Russel, F. 1975 The Pima Indians. University of Arizona Press, Tucson.Google Scholar
Schif Fer, M. B. 1976 Behavioral Archeology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schif Fer, M. B. 1979 A Preliminary Consideration of Behavioral Change. In Transformations: Mathematical Approaches to Culture Change, edited by Renfrew, C. and Cooke, K., pp. 353–368. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Schif Fer, M. B., and Skibo, J. M. 1987 Theory and Experiment in the Study of Technological Change. Current Anthropology 28: 595–622.Google Scholar
Scully, E. G. 1951 Some Central Mississippi Valley Projectile Point Types. Manuscript on file, Museum of Anthropology. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Seeman, M. F. 1992 The Bow and Arrow, The Intrusive Mound Complex, and a Late Woodland Jack's Reef Horizon in the Mid-Ohio Valley. In Cultural Variability in Context: Woodland Settlements of the Mid-Ohio Valley, edited by Seeman, M., pp. 41–51. MCJA Special Paper No. 7. Kent, Ohio.Google Scholar
Shott, M. 1986 Technological Organization and Settlement Mobility: An Ethnographic Examination. Journal of Anthropological Research 42: 15–51.Google Scholar
Shott, M. 1988 Stone Tools in Cultural Perspective: Lithic Analysis at the Childers and Woods Sites, Mason County, West Virginia. Paper Presented at the Southeastern Archaeological Conference, New Orleans.Google Scholar
Shott, M. 1989 On Tool Class Use Lives and the Formation of Archaeological Assemblages. American Antiquity 54: 9–30.Google Scholar
Shott, M. 1992 Radiocarbon Dating as a Probabilistic Technique: The Childers Site and Late Woodland Occupation in the Ohio Valley. American Antiquity 57: 202–230.Google Scholar
Shott, M. (compiler) 1990 Childers and Woods: Two Late Woodland Sites in the Upper Ohio Valley, Mason County, West Virginia. Report of Investigation No. 200. University of Kentucky Program for Cultural Resource Assessment, Lexington.Google Scholar
Silverwood-Cope, P. 1972 A Contribution to the Ethnography of the Colombian Maku. Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spencer, L. 1974 Replicative Experiments in the Manufacture and Use of a Great Basin Atlatl. In Great Basin Atlatl Studies, edited by Hester, T., Mildner, M, and Spencer, L., pp. 37–60. Ballena Press, Menlo Park, California.Google Scholar
Spratt, D. A. 1982 The Analysis of Innovation Processes. Journal of Archaeological Science 9: 79–94.Google Scholar
Swanton, J. R. 1946 The Indians of the Southeastern United States. Bulletin No. 137. Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Thomas, D. H. 1978 Arrowheads and Atlatl Darts: How the Stones Got the Shaft. American Antiquity 43: 461–472.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. H. 1986 Points on Points: A Reply to Flenniken and Raymond. American Antiquity 619–627.Google Scholar
Tuohy, D. R. 1982 Another Great Basin Atlatl with Dart Foreshafts and Other Artifacts: Implications and Ramifications. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 4: 80–106.Google Scholar
Webb, W. S. 1974 Indian Knoll. University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Webb, W. S., and DeJamette, D. L. 1942 An Archaeological Survey of Pickwick Basin. Bulletin No. 129. Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C. Google Scholar
Wilkie, D. S. 1989 Impact of Roadside Agriculture on Subsistence Hunting in the Ituri Forest of Northeastern Zaire. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 78: 485–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmsen, E. N. 1989 Land Filled with Flies: A Political Economy of the Kalahari. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Winters, H. D. 1963 An Archaeological Survey of the Wabash Valley in Illinois. Reports of Investigations No. 10. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Wray, D. E., and Mac Neish, R. S. 1961 The Hopewellian and Weaver Occupations of the Weaver Site, Fulton County, Illinois. Scientific Papers Vol. VII, pt. 2. Illinois State Museum, Springfield.Google Scholar
Wymer, D. A. 1990 Archaeobotanyof Childers and Woods. In Childers and Woods: Two Late Woodland Sites in the Upper Ohio Valley, Mason County, West Virginia, compiled by Shott, M., pp. 486–616. Report of Investigation No. 200. University of Kentucky Program for Cultural Resource Assessment, Lexington.Google Scholar
Yost, J. A., and Kelley, P. M. 1983 Shotguns, Blowguns, and Spears: The Analysis of Technological Efficiency. In Adaptive Responses of Native Amazonians, edited by Hames, R. and Vickers, W., pp. 189–224. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar