Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Zooarchaeology, Improvement and the British Agricultural Revolution

  • Published:
International Journal of Historical Archaeology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper seeks to revisit the debate concerning the nature and timing of the British Agricultural Revolution. Specifically, it considers how zooarchaeological evidence can be employed to investigate later-medieval and post-medieval “improvements” in animal husbandry. Previous studies of animal bone assemblages have indicated that the size of many domestic species in England increases from the fifteenth century—an observation that has been used to support the writings of those historians that have argued that the Agricultural Revolution occurred several centuries prior to the traditionally ascribed date of 1760–1840. Here, zooarchaeological data are presented which suggest that the size of cattle, sheep, pig and domestic fowl were increasing from as early as the fourteenth century. However, it is argued that the description of these changes as revolutionary is misleading and disguises the interplay of factors that influenced agricultural practice in the post-Black Death period. This paper concludes with a plea for greater awareness of the value of collecting and analysing faunal data from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to enable the historically attested productivity increases of the traditionally dated Agricultural Revolution to be examined archaeologically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albarella, U. (1997). Size, power and veal: Zooarchaeological evidence for late medieval innovations. In de Boe, G. and Verhaeghe, F. (eds.), Environment and Subsistence in Medieval Europe: Papers of the ‘Medieval Europe Brugge 1997’ Conference Volume 9, I.A.P. Rapporten 9, Zellik, pp. 19–30.

  • Albarella, U. (2002). ‘Size matters’: How and why biometry is still important in zooarchaeology. In Dobney, K. and O'Connor, T. P. (eds.), Festschrift for Don Brothwell, Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp. 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albarella, U., and Davis, S. (1996). Mammals and birds from Launceston Castle, Cornwall: Decline in status and the rise of agriculture. Circaea 12: 1–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albarella, U., and Payne, S. (2005). Neolithic pigs from Durrington Walls, Wiltshire, England: A biometrical database. Journal of Archaeological Science 32: 589–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albarella, U., Beech, M., and Mulville, J. (1997). The Saxon, Medieval and Post-Medieval Mammal and Bird Bones Excavated 1989–1991 from Castle Mall, Norwich, Norfolk, Ancient Monuments Laboratory Report 72/97, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. C. (1991). The two English Agricultural Revolutions, 1450–1850. In Campbell, B. and Overton, M. (eds.), Land, Labour and Livestock: Historical Studies in European Agricultural Productivity, Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp. 236–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, A., and Noddle, B. (1975). Absence of premolar teeth from ruminant mandibles found at archaeological sites. Journal of Archaeological Science 2: 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, J. V. (1990). The Agricultural Revolution, Basil Blackwood Ltd., Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, P. (1984). Dudley Castle Archaeological Project—First Interim Report (1983–1984). West Midlands Archaeology 27: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, G., and Payne, S. (1988). Components of variation in measurements of pig bones and teeth, and the use of measurements to distinguish wild from domestic pig remains, Archaezoologia 2: 27–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. M. S., and Overton, M. (1993). A new perspective on medieval and early modern agriculture: Six centuries of Norfolk farming, c.1250–c.1850. Past and Present 141: 38–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J. D., and Mingay, G. E. (1966). The Agricultural Revolution 1750–1880, B. T. Batsford, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossette, E., and Horad-Herbin, M.-P. (2003). A contribution to the morphometrical study of cattle in Colonial North America. Journal of Archaeological Science 30: 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. J. M. (1992). A Rapid Method for Recording Information about Mammal Bones from Archaeological Sites, Ancient Monuments Laboratory Report 19/92, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. J. M. (1996). Measurements of a group of adult female Shetland sheep skeletons from a single flock: A baseline for zooarchaeologists. Journal of Archaeological Science 23: 593–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. J. M. (1997). The Agricultural Revolution in England: Some zooarchaeological evidence. Anthropozoologica 25/ 26: 413–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. J. M., and Beckett, J. V. (1999). Animal husbandry and agricultural improvement: The archaeological evidence from animal bones and teeth. Rural History 10: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, C. C. (1981). Warwickshire Farming 1349–c.1520: Preparations for Agricultural Revolution, Dugdale Society Occasional Papers No. 27, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, C. C. (1997). Medieval farming and technology: Conclusion. In Astill, G. and Langdon, J. (eds.), Medieval Farming and Technology: The Impact of Agricultural Change in Northwest Europe, Brill, Leiden, pp. 293–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobney, K., Jaques, S. D., and Irving, B. G. (1996). Of Butchers and Breeds: Report on Vertebrate Remains from Various Sites in the City of Lincoln, Lincoln Archaeological Studies No. 5. Technical Print Services, Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • von den Driesch, A. (1976). A Guide to the Measurement of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites, Peabody Museum Bulletin 1, Harvard University.

  • Ernle, L. (1912). English Farming Past and Present, Longmans, Green, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fock, J. (1966). Metrische Untersuchungen an Metapodien einiger Europäischer Rinderrasen, Unpublished dissertation, University of Munich, Munich.

  • Higham, C. (1969). The metrical attributes of two samples of bovine limb bones. Journal of Zoology 157: 63–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, C., and Message, M. (1969). An assessment of a prehistoric technique of bovine husbandry. In Brothwell, D. and Higgs, E. (eds.), Science in Archaeology: A Survey of Progress and Research (2nd ed.), Thames and Hudson, London, pp. 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopcraft, R. L. (1994). The social origins of agrarian change in late medieval England. The American Journal of Sociology 99(6): 1559–1595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1996). An Archaeology of Capitalism, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerridge, E. (1967). The Agricultural Revolution, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerridge, E. (1969). The Agricultural Revolution reconsidered. Agricultural History 43: 463–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadow, R. (1999). The use of size index scaling techniques for research on archaeozoological collections from the Middle East. In Becker, C., Manhart, H., Peters, J. and Schibler, J. (eds.), Historia Animalium ex Ossibus. Festschrift für Anglea von den Driesch, Verlag Marie Leidorf GmbH, Rahden/Westf, pp. 285–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, A. E. W., and Grigson, C. (1990). Colyer's Variations and Diseases of the Teeth of Animals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingay, G. E. (1969). Dr. Kerridge's “Agricultural Revolution”: A comment. Agricultural History 42: 477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingay, G. E. (1989). The Agrarian History of England and Wales Volume VI, 1750–1850, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connor, T. P. (2000). The Archaeology of Animal Bones, Sutton, Stroud.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, M. (1984). Agricultural revolution? Development of the agrarian economy in early modern England. In Baker, A. R. H. and Gregory, D. (eds.), Explorations in Historical Geography: Interpretative Essays, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 118–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, M. (1996a). Re-establishing the English Agricultural Revolution. Agricultural History Review 44: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, M. (1996b). Agricultural Revolution in England: The Transformation of the Agrarian Economy 1500–1850, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackham, O. (1986). The History of the Countryside: The Classic History of Britain's Landscape, Flora and Fauna, Dent, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitz, E., and Ruff, B. (1994). Morphometric data for cattle from North America and the Caribbean prior to the 1850s. Journal of Archaeological Science 21: 699–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thirsk, J. (1987). England's Agricultural Regions and Agrarian History in England, 1500–1700, Macmillan Education, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. N. W. (1988). A statistical examination of criteria used in sexing cattle metapodials. Archaeozoologia 2: 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. (1999). Feasting at Worcester Cathedral in the seventeenth century: A zooarchaeological and historical approach. Archaeological Journal 156: 342–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. (2002). Animals, Economy and Status: The Integration of Historical and Zooarchaeological Data in the Study of a Medieval Castle, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

  • Thomas, R. (2003). The 19th–20th century animal bones from Stafford Castle: An educational collection and a zooarchaeological investigation, Unpublished report.

  • Thomas, R. (2005). Animals, Economy and Status: Integrating Zooarchaeological and Historical Data in the Study of Dudley Castle, West Midlands (c. 1100–1750), BAR British Series 392. Archaeopress, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow-Smith, R. (1957). A History of British Livestock Husbandry to 1700, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. E., Beckett, J. V., and Afton, B. (2001). Farm Production in England 1700–1914, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhulst, A. (1990). The “Agricultural Revolution” of the Middle Ages reconsidered. In Bachrach, B. S. and Nicholas, D. (eds.), Law, Custom and the Social Fabric of Medieval Europe: Essays in Honor of Bryce Lyon, Medieval Institute Publications, Western Michigan University, Michigan, pp. 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, T. (2002). The Transformation of Rural England: Farming and the Landscape 1700–1870, University of Exeter Press, Exeter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard Thomas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomas, R. Zooarchaeology, Improvement and the British Agricultural Revolution. Int J Histor Archaeol 9, 71–88 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-005-8140-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761-005-8140-9

Keywords

Navigation