Abstract
Changing economies and patterns of trade, rather than climatic deterioration, could have critically marginalized the Norse Greenland settlements and effectively sealed their fate. Counter-intuitively, the end of Norse Greenland might not be symptomatic of a failure to adapt to environmental change, but a consequence of successful wider economic developments of Norse communities across North Atlantic. Data from Greenland, the Faroe Islands, and medieval Iceland is used to explore the interplay of Norse society with climate, environment, settlement, and other circumstances. Long term increases in vulnerability caused by economic change and cumulative climate changes sparked a cascading collapse of integrated interdependent settlement systems, bringing the end of Norse Greenland.
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Log in using your username and password
Purchase access
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Cultural specialization as a double-edged sword: division into specialized guilds might promote cultural complexity at the cost of higher susceptibility to cultural loss
- Climate change facilitated the early colonization of the Azores Archipelago during medieval times
- More-Than-Human Intimacies and Traditional Knowledge among Hunting Families in Northwest Greenland
- Marine Shielings in Medieval Norse Greenland
- Climate challenges, vulnerabilities, and food security
- Cultural adaptation, compounding vulnerabilities and conjunctures in Norse Greenland
- Abrupt Holocene climate change as an important factor for human migration in West Greenland