Arctic Anthropology
Univ British Columbia Press
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Arctic Anthro. 46(1-2):132-143 (2009);
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Estévez, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Case Studies on Methodology and Social and Economic Dimensions

Ethnoarchaeology in the Uttermost Part of the Earth

Jordi Estévez

Jordi Estévez, Professor titular de Prehistòria. Doctor Vinculat al CSIC, Grup d’Arqueologia Social Americana, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Unitat Associada al CSIC, Laboratori d’Arqueozoologia, Edifici Facultat de Medecina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain 08193

Our ethnoarchaeological research projects since 1986 have focused on testing and developing archaeological theories, inference systems, and methodologies for recovery and analysis of prehistoric European hunter-gatherer societies. The research began by contrasting the ethnographic image of the Tierra del Fuego gatherer-fisher-hunter groups with the archaeological record from sites attributable to the people defined as "Yamana" and "Selknam" in ethnographies. The research dealt with the variability of the resources and space management strategies and their links to the social organization of these groups. We excavated settlements as well as burial and ritual places. As a result of the research we argue the necessity of using analytical categories of social significance related to work processes, absolute value, and the distribution and consumption of goods. Working with such categories is productive but requires one to rethink some of the general analogies and common a prioris in the study of prehistoric societies.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Copyright 2009 by The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System